Mark Vanderpump on hypothyroidism treatment debate

SfE BES 2015 (RGB)This year at BES we will be debating the controversial topic of Hypothyroidism treatment. Join us on Monday 2 November 2015 at 7pm to hear two leaders in the field discuss the pros and cons of combination T3 and T4 treatments. The debate chair Mark Vanderpump, Consultant Physician and Honorary Senior Lecturer in Diabetes and Endocrinology at the Royal Free London, has written a short blog post to summarise the history of the issue and the key arguments. 

Over one million people in the UK take the thyroid hormone levothyroxine sodium (L-T4). Few are aware of controversies that have surrounded the treatment of hypothyroidism for over a century from the first injections of sheep thyroid by Murray in 1891 to the ongoing debate over the advantages of combining L-T4 with liothyronine (L-T3). The goal of therapy is to restore patient well-being and normalise serum thyrotrophin (TSH) levels. Most patients respond satisfactorily but a minority of treated individuals experience persistent symptoms despite adequate biochemical correction. The care of such individuals is challenging and remains the subject of considerable public interest. Some non-mainstream practitioners advocate the use of alternative thyroid therapies including L-T3 and thyroid extracts, and combination therapy with L-T4 and L-T3.

PortraitIt can be argued that L-T4 is the most perfect hormone replacement that has yet been devised for endocrine conditions, but there are people who fall outside the current treatment model. Animal-derived products that contain thyroxine (T4) and triiodothyronine (T3) are not physiological and are not the answer in the longer term, but we do need to find ways to ensure that all our patients with hypothyroidism feel the full benefits of replacement therapy.

The British Thyroid Association (BTA) has recently published a peer-reviewed statement in Clinical Endocrinology. Levothyroxine therapy offers a safe, rational, and simplified approach to the correction of hypothyroidism, and for the vast majority of patients, treatment results in improved physical and psychological well-being. The benefits of combination therapy with LT-4 and LT-3 are still unproven and the potential for harm exists with unregulated use of unapproved therapies. Future RCTs will be of value, especially on the use of combination therapy in patients with specified genetic or clinical characteristics. Strategies to improve medication adherence, optimise drug delivery, and standardise thyroid hormone formulations will ultimately improve patient outcomes.

SfE BES 2015 web banner(728x90px)HIRES 2

One thought on “Mark Vanderpump on hypothyroidism treatment debate

  1. Do you know if there will be a patient voice heard in this critical debate, someone directly impacted by it? If not, how could one be? For many of us, doctors have excluded our voices, and the experiences of thousands, from the discussion. Our symptoms have been dismissed. Too often we are told that if we don’t respond to T4 monotherapy, there is simply nothing to be done. Or worse, told that it is our fault. And we are left to get sicker and sicker. We need our voices to be hear.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s